42 Months post-Katrina: Where are health records?

I’m getting ready for a week of vacation in my hometown–New Orleans. As some of you who know me well may remember, my 89-year-old mother has been with us in Florida since Katrina-breached levees filled her New Orleans home with 8 feet of water. Our last visit was almost 22 months ago; it is definitely time for Mom to see family and friends who returned to LA after the storm.

Preparing for this trip in the midst of all the hubbub about EMRs and economic stimulus plans reminds me of those first few weeks after the storm. Mom was two months post MI when Katrina threatened and I was on my third post heart attack visit. When the mayor started talking about mandatory evacuation, we left Mom’s house with a change of clothes and her medications, and headed to my brother’s place in Louisville, MS. Three days later, when it became clear that we would not be returning to NOLA soon, we came here to Florida.

The first week post storm was spent buying a few clothes, shopping for doctors and getting prescriptions transferred to a local pharmacy. Fortunately, many pharmacies already shared data electronically in 2005, even when prescriptions were written by hand; but prescriptions were expiring and we needed a physician to write new ones. As we started going to appointments with a new primary care physician and a cardiologist, I was faced with the challenge of recreating 85 years of health history with my mother’s limited memory and my tangential recollections from a 600 mile distance. Mom was about half way through a cardiac rehabilitation program at the hospital at which she had been treated. Our local hospital was willing to have her participate in their rehab program, but they decided not to charge her rather than try to deal with Medicare about incomplete services for which there were no records.

At the end of Mom’s fourth week with us, I headed to Washington, D.C. for a meeting of the Software and Technology Vendor Association (SATVA) and to attend the National Summit on Defining a Strategy for Behavioral Health Information Management and Its Role within the Nationwide Health Information Infrastructure (Summit) co-hosted by SATVA and SAMHSA . When Tom Trabin, Ph.D. (then SATVA Executive Director) and others came up with the idea of a Summit, the need was only an abstraction for me. Of course mental health providers needed to be involved in the gradual move toward EMRs. By the time of the Summit, I had concrete first-hand experience with the reason for the meeting. My 85 year old mother and thousands of other New Orleans residents were completely without health records. Doctors’ offices and hospitals were flooded just as was her home. It was not even possible to reach her doctors, much less get information from them; they were displaced just as their patients were. The Summit pressed me to a concrete conclusion: behavioral health providers and consumers could not afford to be left out in the cold when catastrophe happens, and mental health could not let the general health field get too far ahead in the move to electronic medical records (EMRs).

After all, what physician or psychologist would be able to recreate a record from memory? And how many individuals carry an accurate health history in their head? The best anyone could do in 2005 was use health claim information from insurance carriers, Medicare and Medicaid. Frankly, for most physicians, it was too much trouble to attempt to obtain such information, even though a means of getting that data had been established. In some places that received large numbers of evacuees who had urgent healthcare needs and no family members with them, the network of access that was cobbled together from Medicare, Medicaid and VA claims databases allowed diagnosis and treatment of those with acute needs, but that took weeks to put in place. This destruction of health records became one of the most obvious reasons to press for a national system of electronic health records (EHRs), one that would not simply be washed away in eight feet of water.

So where are we 3 1/2 years later? If another Katrina-like catastrophe occurred tomorrow, would we be in any better position to treat evacuees based on information from an EMR or from a Personal Health Record (PHR)?

My guess is that we would be in just the same position we were in 2005. More physicians and hospitals are now using EMRs. The President and Congress have just appropriated 19 billion dollars for expanding the infrastructure and use of EHRs that we were discussing in 2005; but the reality is that we are nowhere near where we need to be to assure that continued care can be provided for general health or for mental health consumers. For the last 3 1/2 years there has been lots of activity, but today between 13% and 17% of provider organizations use EMRs; and there is still no system in place for sharing information among different organizations. Given a flood and no off-site backup of the electronic data, we would have exact duplication of the Katrina results.

Now that $19 billion that has been made available for meaningful use of EMRs over the next few years, we can expect more frenzied activity and attempts to implement EMRs in more organizations. We can hope that a simultaneous effort will be made to assure that the information in those records will be protected from destruction and can be shared from one organization to another. Where will you be in this process? Is it time for your organization to start to consider implementation of a behavioral health EMR? Are you obtaining the necessary information to qualify for federal funding? How will your clinical records be handled 3 1/2 years from now?

To comment on the article, click on the title and enter your comment in the box at the bottom of the page.

Wal-Mart and Mental Health EMR: Unlikely

For the past week the health IT news world (NYTimes; Chicago Sun Times; MSN; ) and blogosphere (FierceHealthIT; Healthcare Informatics) have been abuzz with Wal-Mart’s announcement that they will begin selling electronic health record (EHR) software to doctor’s offices starting this Spring. They will do so in partnership with eClinicalWorks and Dell through their Sam’s Club stores.  

Our initial reaction was panic. After all, if the world’s largest retailer decides to get into our market space, how can we possibly survive? And what does this mean for our customers?

Then we started reading the fine print. The cost for the first physician in the practice will be $25,000 plus $10,000 for each additional physician. The first year’s price includes hardware, installation, some training, technical support, and a variety of other odds and ends. And that is for software as a service. That means you do not own a license for the software; rather you connect into the company’s system and maintain your records there.  (This is the model that some people believe is the only viable one for a broad national system, but many dispute that.) After the first year, the cost per doctor is $500 per month.

John D. Halamka, M.D., CIO of the CareGroup Health System and Harvard Medical School among many other posts, is convinced that this pricing is fair and that Wal-Mart’s expertise in supply chain management and their own experience with IT systems inhouse will make their coordination of this project a success. In fact, he says that its a “good deal“. 

While this sort of price point might be cost effective and competitive for general and speciality medical physician practices, it is certainly not so for those in behavioral health practices. Most community based behavioral health organizations are also not likely to find this pricing structure something they can build into their budget.

If this is the Sam’s Club bargain software, where does that leave mental health providers? While there are currently a few companies with very reasonably priced electronic medical records (EMRs) aimed at the behavioral health community, time will tell whether meeting the requirements for CCHIT certification and paying to acquire that certification will allow the products of this small cadre of companies to remain affordable.

What’s your take on the Wal-Mart announcement? Where do you see this search for the EMR going for you? 

To add your comment, click on the title of the article and enter your thoughts in the box at the bottom of the page.

 


ARRA’s New Privacy and Security Requirements

I was all set to write an article Monday morning on the expanded privacy and security requirements in the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) when I remembered that I was registered for a webinar presented by FairWarning (a privacy surveillance company) Monday afternoon on just that subject. I am really glad I waited to write, because this webinar provided a wealth of information on the new requirements. [By the way, you will also see this section of ARRA (Title XIII) referred to as the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. Subtitle D contains the Privacy provisions.]

Many people and organizations have opined that EHRs will not take hold in general medical settings or in behavioral healthcare until consumers and providers trust that the EHR products and the means of transferring data are truly secure and protect the privacy of the patient. Webinar presenter Deven McGraw, of the Center for Democracy & Technology, most articulately presented the aspects of ARRA that will increase the privacy and security requirements that healthcare providers must follow. She indicated changes in four broad areas including substantive modifications to HIPAA statutory requirements, increased enforcement of HIPAA, provisions to address health information held by entitites not covered by HIPAA, and a variety of administrative changes.

The new law incorporates and expands upon the HIPAA requirements.

  • There has been an attempt to more clearly define certain terms, like just what a “breach” of privacy is.
  • Previously, covered entities where the only ones required to report breaches of privacy; now the same requirement is placed upon Business Associates.
  • HITECH strengthens the individual’s right to restrict disclosures of health information to their insurance plan and even allows the individual to “opt out” of electronic recording and sharing of their information if they pay for their services privately and in advance. Mental health services are frequently cited as  sensitive content that an individual may want left out of their electronic record.
  • The HIPAA mandate requiring that a provider not release psychotherapy notes to the insurer has been included in this act, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) has been ordered to study whether psychological test data should be included in this exception.
  • ARRA improves upon the HIPAA “minimum necessary” standard requiring that only the minimum amount of patient information should be disclosed depending upon the specific request for information.
  • The legislation places requirements upon companies that provide Personal Health Records (PHR) for the security of the data in those records, and prohibits the sale of protected health information.
  • Most importantly, the law provides an ongoing process for setting privacy and security standards and evaluating their effectiveness. 

brief summary of these changes written by the American Psychological Association was published by Behavioral Healthcare magazine in February.

Perhaps the most important thing behavioral health providers need to realize is that the move toward mental health EHRs is happening. How exactly those records will interface with the rest of the National Health Information Network and exactly what information will be shared with other healthcare providers remains to be seen, but this endeavor is irrevocably marching forward. Where will you be in this process?

To comment on this article, click on the title and insert your comment in the box at the bottom of the page.

Healthcare Reform a National Priority?

During the election season of 2008, healthcare reform was one of the highest priority items discussed on the campaign trail. Everybody seemed to be in favor of it, whatever it is. Each candidate had their own version of healthcare reform, but both of the principal candidates agreed that adoption of interoperable technological solutions would be a crucial part of increasing the quality of care and decreasing the cost of that care.

Since the September and October financial crashes, healthcare has taken a bit of a backseat in media discussions of what comes next when President-Elect Obama is inaugurated. Everyone is clear that the financial wreckage must come first, but many who work in the healthcare arena have worked hard to maintain a focus on our broken healthcare system.

During late November and December Obama requested public input about the healthcare system and how it should change. The National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare reported in its January 8 Public Policy Update that over 8500 small discussion groups met in person and virtually to give their input on change needed in the system. Also on January 8, former Sen. Tom Daschle testified before the Senate committee about his confirmation as Secretary of Health and Human Services and Healthcare Reform Czar. 

A common theme throughout these discussions is the need for Information Technology (IT) to be a central part of all this reform. There are many who believe that Electronic Health Records (EHR) will massively change the way healthcare is delivered, along with the quality and the cost of the care that is provided.

On Thursday, January 8, the National eHealth Collaborative was launched. This organization is a public-private partnership that is the successor to the American Health Information Community (AHIC), the quasi-governmental group founded to further the goal of developing a secure interoperable nationwide health information system. This group is moving forward toward the goal of having all health records accessible to all healthcare providers in real time when the person is sitting in their office or clinic or hospital.

Always keeping the needs of the behavioral health community in its focus, the National Council through its Excutive Director, Linda Rosenberg, MSW, includes funding of IT for behavioral health community organizations as one of their primary goals for the next year. Of course, this does not include providers in the private sector. In the general healthcare arena, some large health systems have been providing EHRs to their physician members, but I have seen no such activity in behavioral health.

In late October of 2008, Robert M. Kolodner, M.D., National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, reported on the progress of adoption of IT at the 2008 Institute of Behavioral Health Informatics. An Open Minds On-Line news service article suggests that enough momentum may have been accomplished in 2008 to bring us to a tipping point, and that IT adoption will move forward rapidly from here.

What is your take on healthcare reform? What needs to happen to our system to cut costs and improve care? Do you see IT advances like interoperable EHRs as essential to saving our healthcare system?

Its your turn to join the discussion! To enter your comment, just click on the title of this article and enter your comment at the bottom of the page. To subscribe to this blog, click on one of the subscription methods in the top of the right sidebar.

Kathy Peres
Vice President
Synergistic Office Solutions, Inc.

Behavioral Health EHR: Dream or Reality, Obstacle or Asset

Last month I wrote an article about movement toward Electronic Health Records (EHR) in the behavioral health community. I was stunned by your silence on the issue. So much of my energy for the past two years has been focused on EHRs, their use in general medicine and in mental health, that I was very surprised that our readers were not interested in discussing EHRs. I am not sure whether the booming silence was a reflection of denial about movement toward these products, lack of information about them, or some other factors. So let’s start with some information.

In May, 2003 the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health reported that the mental health community has been much slower to adopt Electronic Medical Records than the general medical community in spite of the potential benefit for consumers being just as great. The Commission concluded that a substantial effort should be made to develop the infrastructure to support interoperable electronic medical records and personal health records, and that the behavioral health community should move forward with adoption of appropriate products.

Early in 2006, a SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration)-funded Behavioral Health EHR Profile Workgroup, a multi-stakeholder effort to develop an EHR Conformance Profile for behavioral health began work. I joined that workgroup early in 2007 and participated through the adoption of a standard for Behavioral Health EHRs by HL7 this past summer. The Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology (CCHIT) has formed the necessary workgroup to develop testing and certification standards for Behavioral Health EHRs and plans to begin such certification by summer 2010.

The thinking about EHRs and their benefit are multiple. Primarily, they are believed to improve the quality of care by minimizing errors and duplication, by providing decision support for the provider, by offering evidence-based practice options, and by making all that information available rapidly to other providers. Adding Personal Health Records (PHRs) into the mix and connecting everything by way of a National Health Information Network (NHIN) or Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) will provide real-time information access for both consumers and providers of health care services.

The election of Barack Obama has spurred lots of discussion about the direction that healthcare reform will take. He mentioned electronic medical records in speeches and debates, but there is not yet much information about how he will pursue policy in that arena. The current financial crisis and recession will undoubtedly take priority over healthcare reform, but the cost of healthcare makes it a pressing issue for everyone.

I have heard providers talk about EHRs in widely varied ways. Some (including some of our customers) have used software products to maintain their clinical records for years and would not want to practice without one. Some clinicians believe that such a product would create obstacles to best care of their clients. Others are concerned about workflow interruption and the amount of time it might take to utilize an EHR. And those of us who work in the industry and are clinicians by training have major concern about privacy and security of health records generally and EHRs in particular.

What are your thoughts about EHRs? Do you see them becoming a part of the picture for your organization? Do you have a plan for purchase of such a product? Do you already use an EHR? How well does it do the job for you? Please let us know your thoughts. What providers think and how they plan to behave will control how this all unfolds.

You can comment on this post by clicking on the title of the post and entering your Comment in the form below.

Thanks for your thoughts.